Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama’s former chief of staff, once said, “Never let a crisis go to waste.” It seems leftists/globalists have taken that to heart worldwide. There is no doubt that the COVID-19 virus is real and it has caused many to become ill and some to die. In 2020, the virus killed 375,000 souls. Today that figure is 571,464. Half a million deaths is a tragedy, especially for loved ones left behind to mourn those deaths. However, let’s put all this into perspective. We are a nation of 330 million people. Using a percentage calculator--because I’m no math whiz--that amounts to .173% of our US population who has died of COVID-19. To further add to the perspective, in 2020, 598,000 individuals died of cancer while 690,000 passed away from heart disease. Oh, and did you know that 78% of those hospitalized with the coronavirus have been overweight or obese? No, you probably didn’t. You never actually hear these numbers do you? That’s because the fake news media wants you scared. The reason? We’ll discuss that in a bit.
Another interesting statistic is that the average age of those who have succumbed to death from COVID-19 in the UK is 82.4 years. It was very easy to find that information on a number of sites, but if you try to find the same information for those who have died in the US, you would be hard-pressed to locate it. Sure you can find a lot of charts and graphs, but unless you’re a mathematician, you are out of luck. The only site I found with this information is a forum which isn’t scientific, but we’ll use that number anyway because it’s close to what I found for the UK. That number is 78 years. Interestingly, the average life expectancy for women in the US is 81, and for men it’s 77. Let that sink in for a moment. We have upended our lives and small businesses, have suffered through draconian restrictions, and have been forced to wear something on our faces that is not really effective in stopping the spread of the disease.
In fact, a new Stanford NIH peer-reviewed study has found what most of us have suspected. According to the study:
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical face masks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death.
Why do you suppose the tech giants and the fake news media haven’t reported on this study? Why do they want us wearing something that is ineffective against corona virus and can actually cause us harm? My belief is that this has become political. Joe and Kamala think masks are good and they’re Democrats. Most in the news media are Democrats. Ergo the mask mandates must stand. No room for dissension.
Oh, did I mention we’ve also given up many of our God-given liberties enshrined in the Constitution during this so-called pandemic. All this for a virus that has a 99.83% survival rate.
I Won’t Be Getting the Vaccine
That brings me to the COVID-19 vaccine. I will not be taking the vaccine, and I’m not an anti-vaxxer. I’ve had all my vaccines as a child, my flu shot in 2020, and my two Shingles shots. Let me explain why I won’t take this vaccine. First of all, this vaccine has not been tested on animals. I was speaking with a former cancer researcher the other day and she said what is happening now is the biggest case study ever for scientists. I said, “Are you saying we are the lab rats?” She answered, “Precisely. We don’t know the long term effects from this vaccine.” The Nuremberg Code (Directives for Human Experimentation) states:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
No manufacturer of the drug can tell us the long-term effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, and let’s remember that the manufacturers cannot be sued if a patient suffers ill effects or death.
Informed consent is also of consequence. According to Healthline, informed consent is “when a healthcare provider — like a doctor, nurse, or other healthcare professional — explains a medical treatment to a patient before the patient agrees to it. This type of communication lets the patient ask questions and accept or deny treatment.” Informed consent does not include coercion, shaming, or brow-beating. How can one make an informed decision to take the vaccine when we know so very little about the effects over time? Count me out.
Blood Clotting From All Three Vaccines
And what about short term side effects? 18 countries in Europe have suspended or banned the vaccine produced by AstraZeneca due to some patients suffering from blood clots after receiving the first dose. In our country we have heard of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine being suspended due to clotting issues, but did you know that between December 14th, 2020 and April 8th, 2021 there have been 400 reports of blood clotting disorders from the Pfizer vaccine, 337 cases reported from the Moderna vaccine, and 56 from Johnson and Johnson? Those numbers might not seem like much based on the number of vaccines administered, but you’re playing Russian roulette by taking the vaccine. And, I stress that we don’t know the long-term effects. In addition, a former vice-president, doctor, and chief scientist at Pfizer had this to say about the vaccine:
There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.
Vaccine Production & Testing Used Fetal Cells
Finally, I won’t be taking the vaccine because all vaccines produced and administered in America have used fetal cells at some point in the testing or production phase. It’s interesting to note that the reasoning explained in all articles I located should not appease Christians. The articles explain that the fetal cells were from “elective” abortions done in the 1970s and 80s. So, because the mother wanted to abort the baby and the fetal cell lines were from decades ago, that should negate any concerns Christians have about taking the vaccines? I don’t think so. God holds us responsible for our decisions, and I will not take part in something I know came from evil means.
Consensus is Not Science
By the way, it is the abortion industry and the women who choose abortion whose constant refrain is, “My body, my choice.” I will be using that same wording to those who try to pressure me to take the vaccine. One of my doctors just recently tried to coerce me into taking it. I gave her my reasons for not taking it, and she didn’t have much to say after that. I’m sure doctors are used to patients who don’t do their due diligence and accept whatever the good doc says. I’m not a leftist, but I do question authority (a popular refrain from liberals in the 60s, 70s, & 80s). By the way, just like politicians like to say that there is a consensus of scientists who agree that the earth is warming (science is not about consensus but about formulating a hypothesis, experimenting to prove the hypothesis, and analyzing the results to come to a conclusion), doctors in the last year seem to be rushing to give the vaccination to everyone and promoting it despite the lack of testing prior to the release of the vaccine. They seem to be accepting the propaganda of the media and people like Anthony Fauci.
Doctors Throughout the World Warn About the Vaccine
But not all doctors agree that the public should take the vaccine. The following link will take you to a nearly 26 minute video with doctors throughout the world warning people not to take the COVID-19 vaccine. You probably haven’t seen this video because YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter have censored it, but it’s on Rumble and is entitled Doctors From Around the World Issue Dire Warning: Do Not Get the COVID Vaccine. Take the time to watch this. You won’t regret it.
America is Being Propagandized
I cannot complete the discussion of whether or not to take the vaccine without a warning about how much of the American public has been propagandized. If you watch MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and PBS among other fake news, you are probably living in a state of fear. These “news” organizations have so terrorized their viewers, many believe that COVID cases mean COVID deaths. Nothing could be further from the truth. Unfortunately, viewers of fake news are giddily rolling up their sleeves to receive something which hasn’t been tested on animals, hasn’t been approved by the FDA, and was tested on fetal tissue. And, I completely forgot to mention that the vaccines include nanotechnology which could alter your DNA. I know people who will not eat genetically modified food and rant about Monsanto, but are eager to themselves become genetically modified with this vaccine.
To Serve Man
Consequently, I fear that many are being fooled into believing that the vaccine is as harmless as the flu shot. The happy talk about something so untested disturbs me, and I was reminded of a Twilight Zone episode from long ago called To Serve Man. The story begins with alien aircraft landing in different parts of the world, one having landed in New York city. The aliens, known as the Kanamit, go to the UN to tell the world they are peaceful and have only come to earth to help mankind. One of the Kanamit leaves behind a book which UN decoders try to decipher but have great difficulty doing so. They only manage to decipher the title: To Serve Man. After months of visiting and helping humans to grow food more productively, world hunger ends. This leads all the nations of the earth to disarm because there is no longer a need for war. The Kanamit then offer to take people to their world which they describe in the most glorious ways, so much so that many humans are eager to board their space crafts and leave the earth for utopia. Here is the scene as they begin to board the craft for paradise.
Are we, too, like the people of earth in the story, being sold a bill of goods? Just asking.
Why Do the Media, Politicians, and the Tech Giants Want Us Scared?
Now, let me touch on the fear factor a little more since I began this blog post explaining that the news media wants you scared. But why would they want a fearful public? Well, Bill Maher--no conservative--has a take on this. On his show recently he said this:
Over the past year, the COVID pandemic has prompted the medical establishment, the media, and the government to take a scared straight approach to getting the public to comply with their recommendations. Well, I’m from a different school; give it to me straight, doc. Because in the long run, that always works better than you can’t handle the truth. … [W]hen all of our sources for medical information have an agenda to spin us, yeah, you wind up with a badly misinformed population, including on the left.”
He went on to cite some statistics about how fearful Democrats are because of the news they watch. Here’s what he said:
Democrats did much worse than Republicans in getting the right answer to the fundamental question, what are the chances that someone who gets COVID will need to be hospitalized? The answer is between one and five percent. 41% of Democrats thought it was over 50%. Another 28% put the chances at 20 to 49. So almost 70% of Democrats are wildly off on this key question, and also have a greatly exaggerated view of the danger of COVID too, and the mortality rate among children. All of which explains why today the states with the highest share of schools that are still closed are all blue states. So, if the right-wing media bubble has to own things like climate change denial, shouldn’t liberal media have to answer for, how did your audience wind up believing such a bunch of crap about COVID?
He’s so right. This fear porn found on most of the fake news sites is all about getting people to comply with the mask mandate and getting the vaccine. However, there could be other reasons the left wants people scared enough to wear masks and take the vaccine.
Globalists Want to Depopulate the World
Let’s discuss first the notion of depopulation or less politically correct: eugenics. Bill Gates, the so-called philanthropist and multi-billionaire, has been donating millions for quite some time to the manufacture of vaccines. He believes, as other well-known global leaders do, that the population is expanding and we need to depopulate so as to reduce carbon output if we are to survive. Listen to this clip noting that Gates thinks vaccines and “reproductive health” services are a way to reduce the population and thus the carbon output. Check out a small portion of his TedTalk speech on overpopulation.
In an abstract entitled “Accountability of International NGOs: Human Rights Violations in Healthcare Provision in Developing Countries and the Effectiveness of Current Measures,” the writer notes,
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded experimental malaria and meningitis vaccine trials across Africa and HPV vaccine programs in India. All of these programs resulted in numerous deaths and injuries, with accounts of forced vaccinations and uninformed consent. Ultimately, these health campaigns, under the guise of saving lives, have relocated large scale clinical trials of untested or unapproved drugs to developing markets where administering drugs is less regulated and cheaper.
Moreover, Gates has seemingly financially benefited from his so-called philanthropic efforts. Here’s how CNN writer Aaron Weaver explains it: “He’s been accused of ‘donating’ vast sums of money to companies that directly benefit himself.” So, do we trust these vaccines, especially when those funding these efforts have another agenda--the depopulation of the earth?
Vaccines Will Sterilize a Huge Portion of the World’s Population
Additionally, Gates isn’t alone regarding depopulation. Sir John Bell, professor of medicine at Oxford University and a part of GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations) and a designer of one of the vaccines has stated that sterilization is a natural consequence of the COVID vaccine. Check it out and note the percentages.
Wow! 60-70% of those who take the vaccine will become sterile. But most do not know this because they have trusted their governments and health officials. It’s time to wake up. Here are some elitists and their views on depopulating the earth. Let’s begin with Ted Turner who said, “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels would be ideal.” And, Henry Kissinger has stated, “World population needs to be decreased by 50%.” Likewise, but in a macabre premonition of current affairs, the late Prince Phillip once said, “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” Finally, singing from the same songbook, David Brower (first Executive Director of the Sierra Club) said this: “Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
I know it sounds like science fiction, but it is reality and it’s happening now. The governments throughout the world, in an effort to depopulate the earth to prevent a catastrophic climate change event, have decided to use the so-called pandemic to entice, fear monger, or coerce individuals into taking the COVID vaccine, knowing that it may kill some (not right away) and sterilize about 70% of those who receive the shot. Remember the mantra: Never let a crisis go to waste.
A One World Government
Yet another reason leftists throughout the world have been intent on instilling hysteria in the public is because they would like to consolidate all power in the hands of a few global elitists. They recognize that most scared people are malleable and will comply with governmental mandates and recommendations to avoid something frightening, especially if they believe it would lead to death. Hmmm...a one world government? Sounds a bit like an Austin Powers spoof with Dr. Evil and Mini-Me laughing maniacally as they attempt to hold the world hostage for money. However, this is anything but funny. The Bible warns of a one-world system of government in the end times. According to an article in NPR, the author, Tom Gjelten, sheds light on a manifesto written and promoted by several conservative leaders in the Catholic Church. The manifesto declares that the COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions are being used to take away citizens’ liberties and promote a one-world system of government. The authors elaborate on the Catholic proclamation stating the following:
We have reason to believe that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world's population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people, and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.
Think this is a one-off, and the conservative Catholic bishops and archbishops who penned this manifesto are one fry short of a Happy Meal? Then, you might want to consider an article written by Gideon Lichfield for MIT Technology Review. He discusses what must happen during the pandemic and what will happen even after the pandemic. He writes, “...this will be, for Westerners at any rate, a new normal, with new rules of behavior and social organization, some of which will probably persist long after the crisis has ended.” He goes on to explain that the new normal will entail contact tracing, disease monitoring, and relaxed movement restrictions only for those who test negative for the illness or who become immune. Lichfield continues, “This new social order will seem unthinkable to most people in so-called free countries. But any change can quickly become normal if people accept it.” Will you accept this? Are we headed for a one-world government of “considerable surveillance and social control”?
Does the Bible Mention a One World Government?
The Bible never mentions the term one-world government, but it does allude to one which will come together in the end times. This nearly four minute video will illustrate how the one-world government is formed in the last days.
The accumulation of power by a few--and in the end by one evil man known as the Antichrist--as prophesied in the Bible, was hard to fathom just a little over a year ago, but now it’s a little easier to imagine, isn’t it?
Vaccine Passports
All this talk of vaccines leads us inevitably to vaccine passports. These so-called vaccine passports will be proof that you’ve had your COVID-19 vaccine. Some hospitals issue cards for you to carry with you proving you’ve been vaccinated, but technology and tech giants are moving quickly to digitize this information under the guise of security for the individual. But will it be secure? Who will be looking at and storing this information? These digital vaccine passports would invariably violate the 4th amendment to the Constitution which states,
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
But remember, the left hates our Constitution; they want the power to control us. Check out this short clip where Dr. Leanna Wen seems disturbed that many Americans who have not been vaccinated are trying to resume “normal lives.” She wants the vaccine passports to be a “carrot” to get people to take the vaccine so they can have some of their liberties back. Hello! Our freedom comes from God and is enshrined in the Constitution. No scientist, doctor, or politician has the right to take away our freedom.
Curiously, The White House has stated it will not mandate the use of vaccine passports, but in the same breath has stated that they can do nothing to stop businesses from using the lack of a vaccine passport to prevent individuals from entering their establishments. In fact, Dr. Anthony Fauci made this statement:
I'm not saying that they should or that they would, but I'm saying you could foresee how an independent entity might say, 'Well, we can't be dealing with you unless we know you're vaccinated,' but it's not going to be mandated from the federal government.
This is a loud dog whistle giving businesses, schools, and airlines the green light to move forward with such an effort.
Big Time Liberal Feminist Opposes the Vaccine Passport
Interestingly, Naomi Wolf, liberal feminist author and former advisor to both Bill Clinton and Al Gore, has publicly voiced her opinion about the vaccine passports. Simply stated: she is not a fan. During an interview on Tucker Carlson’s show she had this to say:
I’m CEO of a tech company. I understand what this platform does. It’s not about the vaccine, it’s not about the virus. It’s about data. And once this rolls out, you don’t have a choice about being part of the system. What people have to understand is that any other functionality can be loaded onto that platform with no problem at all. They’re trying to roll it out around the world. It is so much more than a vaccine pass. I can’t stress this enough. It has the power to turn off your life. Or turn on your life. To let you engage in civil society or be marginalized. It’s catastrophic. It cannot be allowed to continue.
Amen, sister!
A Forerunner of the Mark of the Beast
Frighteningly, it won’t be long before the QR code vaccine passport is replaced with something imprinted on your skin and invisible to the human eye. The technology is already available for this. Take Bill Gates’ new invention. It is being produced by MIT but funded by Gates and is called the Human Implantable Quantum Dot Microneedle Vaccination Delivery System. Basically it involves microscopic needles on a Band-Aid as a delivery system for the vaccine, and it uses an enzyme which glows under infrared light. The name of the enzyme is LUCIFERASE. I kid you not. In addition, Gates would like to “give every human on earth a digital identification mark...and a human implantable device for buying and selling cryptocurrency with a patent number of #060606.”
All of this should make Christians stand up and take note. We’ve already established that the Bible tells us there will be a one world government headed by the Antichrist. We know elite globalists like Bill Gates love money and power and feel they are of such superior intellect that they must be the ones to run a one world government. I personally do not believe the vaccine is the mark of the beast mentioned in the Bible, but I do believe the COVID restrictions for a year, mask mandates, coercing or shaming individuals into getting the vaccine, and possibly even the vaccine passport are all about conditioning the earth’s citizens into eventually worshipping the Antichrist and receiving the mark of the beast. Let’s recall what Revelation has to say about this.
And he [the Antichrist] causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
Can’t you just imagine Gates’ digital identification mark becoming a means to buy food, purchase clothing, and pay for your mortgage?
Final Thoughts
It appears we are dangerously close to the end times. But, let’s remember the Bible warned us about this time period. Revelation 1:3 states, “Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.” But, God’s word also reminds us that “of that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.” So we don’t need to be guessing about the day God will return. Rather we must be “strong and courageous,” as the Bible admonishes, tell people about God’s salvation, and be vigilant. Most importantly we would all do well during this time period to remember a Ronald Reagan adage: “The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.”
Please be aware that the article that you quoted in your blog has been retracted by the editor of the journal of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine (NIH), for being misleading and inaccurate. You published the blog piece containing this excerpt before the retraction took place, so you would not have known about it at the time.
The excerpt from the article that you used (which was the conclusion):
"The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health."
You forgot to add the part below, which was the following sentence in the excerpt you used. I wonder why? IMHO, it is the ONLY part of the article that is TRULY correct.
"Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health."
The source is here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Since the article has been retracted due to inaccuracies, unverified information, and fake credentials used by the author, you should remove all article excerpts from your post. The reasons for the retraction are cited by the Editor-in-Chief below.
"Med Hypotheses. 2021 Jul; 152: 110601.
Published online 2021 May 12. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2021.110601
PMCID: PMC8114149
PMID: 33992504
Retraction notice to "Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis" [Medical Hypotheses 146 (2021) 5]
Baruch Vainshelboim
This retracts the article "Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis" in Med Hypotheses, volume 146 on page 110411.
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal).
This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief.
Medical Hypotheses serves as a forum for innovative and often disruptive ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. However, our strict editorial policy is that we do not publish misleading or inaccurate citations to advance any hypotheses.
The Editorial Committee concluded that the author's hypothesis is misleading on the following basis:
1. A broader review of existing scientific evidence clearly shows that approved masks with correct certification, and worn in compliance with guidelines, are an effective prevention of COVID-19 transmission.
2. The manuscript misquotes and selectively cites published papers. References #16, 17, 25 and 26 are all misquoted.
3. Table 1. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Wearing Facemask and Their Potential Health Consequences, generated by the author. All data in the table is unverified, and there are several speculative statements.
4. The author submitted that he is currently affiliated to Stanford University, and VA Palo Alto Health Care System. However, both institutions have confirmed that Dr Vainshelboim ended his connection with them in 2016.
A subsequent internal investigation by the Editor-in-Chief and the Publisher have determined that this article was externally peer reviewed but not with our customary standards of rigor prior to publication. The journal has re-designed its editorial and review workflow to ensure that this will not happen again in future.
The Editor-in-Chief and the Publisher would like to apologize to the readers of The Journal for difficulties this issue has caused.
The source is here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114149/
You really should source all of your claims for obvious reasons. When you don't, it appears as if you are hiding something.